Monday Morning: Reject the Solution, Not the Concern
Our body can reject an idea before our mind has fully understood it. Learning to pause, observe our reactions, and separate the concern from the proposed solution can lead to better conversations — and better decisions.
MONDAY MORNINGDEVELOPING PEOPLETHINKING DIFFERENTLY
Monday Morning: Reject the Solution, Not the Concern
I had to unlearn a habit I did not even know I had.
When one of my bosses proposed an idea, my body sometimes reacted before I did.
A small nod.
A slight shake of the head.
Raised eyebrows.
A look away.
Sometimes even a change in posture.
I was not trying to be disrespectful. In many cases, I had not even consciously decided whether I agreed.
But my body had already answered.
And when that answer looked negative, the conversation changed.
The other person became more defensive.
Instead of explaining the problem, they started defending the solution.
That became especially noticeable when I was presented with ideas that seemed expensive, reactive, or much bigger than the problem appeared to require.
My first internal reaction was often:
We don’t need to do that.
The problem was that sometimes my face had already said it.
Over time, I realized that I was making my own work harder.
By showing disagreement too early, I was pushing the conversation toward defending an idea instead of understanding why the idea had appeared in the first place.
So I started practicing something very simple.
I stopped reacting.
At first, very consciously.
I paid attention to my head.
My eyes.
My mouth.
My shoulders.
Even the way I sat.
I began to notice how quickly the body can communicate judgment.
A slight head movement can say no.
Raised eyebrows can say seriously?
Looking away can say I’m done listening.
A sigh may say more than an entire sentence.
None of those reactions necessarily mean what the other person thinks they mean.
But once they are perceived, they become part of the conversation.
So I learned to create a small neutral space.
I listened.
And when I was presented with an idea I was not convinced about, I would often say:
“I’ll take a look at it.”
That sentence bought me something extremely valuable:
Time.
But it also gave the other person something equally valuable:
The feeling that their concern had been heard.
Then I could go back and take the proposal apart.
Not to destroy it.
To understand it.
What problem were they actually seeing?
What were they worried might happen?
What result were they trying to protect?
What had made this particular solution seem necessary?
That last question became especially useful.
Because the proposed solution and the underlying concern are not the same thing.
A proposal may be expensive.
It may be reactive.
It may add unnecessary complexity.
It may even be completely wrong.
But the concern behind it may still be valid.
Sometimes I implemented part of the idea.
Sometimes I found a simpler alternative.
And quite often, I did not implement the original proposal at all.
Instead, I worked on the underlying problem.
If the indicators improved and the concern disappeared, something interesting usually happened:
Nobody cared very much that the original idea had never been implemented.
The solution had become irrelevant.
The concern had not.
That distinction changed the way I listened.
Notice what reacts before you do
One of the hardest parts of communication is that we often believe our response begins when we speak.
It does not.
Our body may have been responding for several seconds already.
So a useful exercise is simply to observe yourself during conversations where you disagree.
What happens first?
Do you shake your head slightly?
Do your eyebrows move?
Do you lean back?
Cross your arms?
Look away?
Smile sarcastically?
Take a deep breath?
Tighten your mouth?
You do not need to eliminate every gesture or turn yourself into a statue.
The goal is not to become unreadable.
The goal is to recognize when an involuntary reaction may be closing a conversation before you have fully understood it.
When you notice that happening, three simple practices can help.
Catch the first physical reaction.
Pay attention to what your body does the moment you hear something you dislike.
Awareness has to come before control.
Create a neutral pause.
Instead of immediately agreeing, rejecting, correcting, or challenging, give yourself a few seconds.
“Let me think about that.”
“I’ll take a look at it.”
Or simply ask another question.
The pause is not avoidance.
It is observation.
Separate the concern from the proposed solution.
Ask yourself:
What am I reacting to — the problem, or the solution being suggested?
That question can completely change the conversation.
Because rejecting a solution too quickly can easily sound like rejecting the concern itself.
And once people feel their concern has been dismissed, they naturally start defending it.
That is when problem solving becomes an argument.
I eventually learned that one of the most useful leadership skills is not knowing how to say no.
It is knowing how to delay the no long enough to understand what deserves a yes.
Sometimes the best response to an idea is neither agreement nor rejection.
It is curiosity.
Reject the solution without rejecting the concern.
Before deciding whether an idea is right, make sure you understand what made it seem necessary.